"We'll just appoint our CFO in Singapore as director": what the Companies Act actually requires of an Indian subsidiary's board

Most foreign parents design the Indian subsidiary's board in the same meeting where they decide the shareholding. The instinct is to keep control tight: two directors from the parent's leadership team, both non-resident, both already sitting on group boards elsewhere. Then the incorporation filing bounces, or worse, it goes through with a "friend of the consultant" listed as the second director, and nobody at the parent understands what that person can now legally do with the company. The resident director requirement is not a formality that a good law firm can drafting-language around. It is a hard eligibility condition in Section 149(3) of the Companies Act 2013, and the person you use to satisfy it acquires real statutory authority the moment they are appointed.

What the regulation actually says

The residency test — Section 149(3), Companies Act 2013. Every company incorporated in India must have at least one director who has stayed in India for a total of not less than 182 days during the financial year. The threshold was reduced from 182 days in the previous calendar year to 182 days in the financial year by the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017, and for a newly incorporated company the 182 days is applied proportionately to the remaining part of the financial year from the date of incorporation. This is a company-level obligation, not a shareholder preference. A private limited company with no resident director is in continuous breach from day one.

Note what the test is not. It is not citizenship, and it is not tax residency under Section 6 of the Income-tax Act. A foreign national who genuinely spends 182+ days in India during the financial year satisfies Section 149(3). An Indian citizen living in London does not. The test is physical presence, and it is measured per financial year — meaning a director who satisfied it last year and has since relocated abroad puts the company back into breach without anyone filing anything.

Minimum board composition — Section 149(1). A private limited company needs a minimum of two directors; a public limited company needs three. Since a wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign parent is almost always a private limited company, the practical floor is two directors, at least one of whom must be resident. That single sentence is where most India-entry board designs quietly fail: the parent wants both seats, but only one of the two can be a non-resident group executive unless the parent is willing to station someone in India.

DIN for foreign nationals — Section 153 and Rule 9, Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules 2014. Every individual intending to be appointed a director must obtain a Director Identification Number. For a first-time director being appointed at incorporation, DIN is allotted through the SPICe+ (INC-32) incorporation form itself — up to three directors can receive DIN this way without a separate application. For an appointment after incorporation, the individual files Form DIR-3 with a digital signature, attested by a practising professional, and the company then files DIR-12 within 30 days of the appointment.

For a foreign national, the DIR-3 documentation is where timelines slip. The passport is mandatory (it is optional only for Indian nationals), and every identity and address document executed outside India must be either apostilled — if the country is a party to the Hague Apostille Convention 1961 — or consularised at the Indian embassy or consulate in that country if it is not. Documents signed while the person is physically in India must be attested differently again. Budget three to four weeks for this, not three days. A foreign national also needs a Digital Signature Certificate from an Indian certifying authority, which itself requires apostilled KYC and, for most CAs, a video verification.

Disqualifications — Section 164. A person is disqualified from directorship if, among other grounds, they have been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude with imprisonment of six months or more, are an undischarged insolvent, or — the one that catches people — have served as a director of a company that failed to file financial statements or annual returns for three continuous financial years. That last ground disqualifies the person for five years across all companies, not just the defaulting one. If your proposed resident director already sits on other Indian boards, this is worth checking before you appoint, because their disqualification becomes your company's problem.

Nominee directors — Section 161(3) and Section 166. A "nominee director" in Indian law is a director appointed by a specific party — an investor, a lender, or the government — under a contract or statute. What the term is colloquially used for in India entry is something else entirely: a local individual, often introduced by a service provider, who is appointed purely to satisfy Section 149(3) while having no operational role. Indian law does not recognise this distinction. Once appointed, that person is a director under Section 2(34) with the full fiduciary duty set in Section 166 — to act in good faith in the interests of the company, to exercise independent judgement, and not to achieve undue gain. They can be held liable as an "officer in default" under Section 2(60). Critically, the duty in Section 166(2) runs to the company, not to whoever nominated them, and the Supreme Court has consistently held that a nominee director cannot subordinate the company's interests to their nominator's.

Practical implications — what happens if you get this wrong

No resident director. Non-compliance with Section 149 attracts a penalty on the company and every officer in default under Section 172 — up to ₹50,000, plus ₹500 per day for a continuing default, capped at ₹3 lakh for the company and ₹1 lakh for each officer. The larger practical damage is upstream: your AD Category-I bank will not process FEMA filings cleanly for a company whose MCA master data shows a board defect, and due diligence on any future round or exit will surface it immediately.

The nominee director you don't control. This is the exposure that founders underestimate. A director appointed to your board can, depending on your articles and board composition, sign banking mandates, be recorded as an authorised signatory, participate in — or block — board resolutions, and, in a two-director board, deadlock every decision. Removing them requires a shareholder resolution under Section 169 with special notice and an opportunity for the director to be heard; if they simply stop cooperating and refuse to sign a resignation (DIR-11), you are managing a governance dispute rather than a filing. A convertible-instrument or downstream-investment timeline does not pause while you do that.

Directors as officers in default. Under Section 2(60), the resident director sitting in India is typically the first person a regulator serves notice on — for GST, for a missed ROC filing, for a labour compliance lapse. If that person has no visibility into operations, they will either resign at the first notice (leaving you non-compliant again) or fail to act, escalating the matter. Neither outcome is a governance strategy.

Vacation of office. Section 167 provides that a director's office is vacated automatically on certain events — including absence from all board meetings held over twelve months. A non-resident director who never attends is not a passive seat; it is a seat that can vacate itself and drop the company below the Section 149(1) minimum.

Step-by-step: what to do

• Decide the residency strategy before name reservation, not after. Choose one of three: (a) relocate a group employee to India for the qualifying period, (b) appoint a genuine India-based hire — a country manager or finance head — as the resident director, or (c) engage a professional resident director under a documented mandate. Option (b) is the only one that scales; option (c) is acceptable as a bridge but should have an exit plan written into the engagement.
• Screen the proposed resident director against Section 164 before appointment. Pull their DIN from the MCA21 portal and check the associated companies' filing status. A five-year disqualification carried in from another board is not curable.
• Start foreign-national DIN documentation four weeks before you need it. Passport, proof of address, and photograph, apostilled (Hague states) or consularised (non-Hague states), plus a DSC from an Indian certifying authority. Run this in parallel with name reservation via RUN or SPICe+ Part A, not sequentially.
• Use SPICe+ (INC-32) to allot DIN at incorporation where you can. Up to three directors get DIN through the incorporation form itself. Appointing a fourth director later means DIR-3, DIR-12, and a separate 30-day clock — avoid it if the board is knowable at incorporation.
• Draft the Articles of Association to constrain the resident director explicitly. Reserve specified matters — banking mandates, borrowing, related-party transactions, issue of shares, change of registered office — to shareholder approval or to a board resolution requiring the parent's nominee's affirmative vote. The AoA is where control lives; the shareholder register alone does not deliver it.
• Put a signed, undated resignation letter and DIR-11 in escrow with counsel where a professional resident director is used. This is standard market practice and materially shortens a removal that would otherwise run through Section 169. It is not a substitute for a proper appointment agreement covering scope, indemnity, D&O cover, and confidentiality.
• File DIR-12 within 30 days of any appointment, resignation, or change in designation, and update the register of directors under Section 170. Track the resident director's day count each financial year — if they are relocating, appoint the replacement before the incumbent's presence falls below 182 days, not after.
• Reconcile board changes with your FEMA filings. A change in authorised signatory affects your AD bank mandate and the details declared on FC-GPR and FC-TRS submissions. Notify the AD bank in the same cycle as the MCA filing.

FAQ

Can a foreign national be the resident director?
Yes. Section 149(3) tests physical presence in India for 182 days in the financial year, not citizenship. A seconded expatriate on an employment visa who genuinely meets the day count qualifies. An OCI cardholder or NRI who does not spend the days does not.

Does the resident director need to hold shares in the Indian company?
No. There is no shareholding qualification for directors of a private limited company unless the Articles of Association impose one. Keep the AoA silent on this — a share qualification only complicates removal.

What is the fastest realistic timeline from decision to an incorporated company with a compliant board?
Roughly four to six weeks where a foreign national is on the board, driven almost entirely by apostille or consularisation of the foreign director's documents and the DSC issuance. If both incorporation-stage directors are already India-resident with existing DINs and DSCs, SPICe+ approval can come through in one to two weeks.

---

Planning India entry? Start with a free structure review at makeitlegit.in

---

See Also

• "We'll just use DCF": What FEMA actually requires for FDI valuation, and the pricing floor that blocks your allotment
• Any bank will do for your India subsidiary: What FEMA actually requires of your AD Category-I bank
• "Our structure is already approved, so the new rules don't affect us": What the draft FEMA (Foreign Investment) Rules 2026 actually change for existing FDI structures